Wife got it done 10 years ago for around $2400/eye (lifetime touch up policy).Last price I got a few years ago was about $4500/eye.
Never bothered with it after opto told me it’ll work for 8-10 years before I’ll need glasses for something or other.
With lasers they can also shoot one eye for distance and one eye for close. Apparently your brain adapts quickly. My issue is close vision is rapidly degrading so until it stabilizes, reshooting is stupid as it uses up tissue and fix won't last long.If you want to spend more and get perfect vision close to far away there's the lens replacement option where your natural lens is removed and an artificial one inserted (kinda like a permanent contact lens) ... I'm considering that but not quite yet as my close up vision is just still "ok".
100% and I'm at the same place as you.With lasers they can also shoot one eye for distance and one eye for close. Apparently your brain adapts quickly. My issue is close vision is rapidly degrading so until it stabilizes, reshooting is stupid as it uses up tissue and fix won't last long.
All very similar here. I was better than -2 (near-sighted) but still annoying and I didn't use contacts that corrected for astigmatism so when riding vision was slightly wonky. I never got to 20/20 and I had my non-dominant eye reshot very shortly after as it was way off (better but not better enough).100% and I'm at the same place as you.
When I did my Lazik back in 2005 I had better than 20/20 vision. Things have progressively changed such that I now have that exact scenario where my left eye is better for distance and my right up close and I'm getting by fine but I too see my close-up getting a bit worse.
I'll do the same and wait until my close-up vision seems to have stabilized (or does it just keep getting worse with every passing year as you age and never stabilizes??).
When I went in about 4 yrs ago to discuss the lens replacement option & pricing they saw me reading stuff on my phone without glasses in the waiting room and said I should wait until I'm 60 and then re-visit ... I'm there now but I think I'll still fight it off as long as I can.
I'd likely be okay with picking up some readers for the close-up stuff as long as the far vision stays good. Once it goes as well, then that's when I'll start researching again and looking at options.
The surgery back in 2005 was the best $$ I've ever spent on myself ... there's something to be said for 'quality of life' expenditures and I highly recommend it to anyone who asks ... just do it once your vision seems to have stabilized as GG suggests. I think I was -2.5 (or was it +2.5) for a few years in a row - that's when I went in for it. Almost 20 yrs later and absolutely no regrets.
At your age and a thought for everyone else, it's possible that you have cataracts or the beginning of them. OHIP will pay to replace the lens in your eyes. You should consider intra ocular lens replacement at extra cost. Essentially they replace the lenses in your eyes with lenses that act similar to contact lenses but imbedded in your eyes. I had laser eye surgery in the late '90s to eliminate the need for glasses and then about 7 years ago had the lens replacement. It's expensive and it may not always be perfect for everyone, but I have no need for glasses at 78 years old.Revive an old thread.
Thinking more about lasik. I'm 71 and really tired of glasses. My night vision has become a problem.
Any newish thoughts? Price?
Last price I got a few years ago was about $4500/eye.
Never bothered with it after opto told me it’ll work for 8-10 years before I’ll need glasses for something or other.
Where was that if you don't mind me asking and what's she think of it?My sister-in-law just had both lenses replaced last week for $8000. Essentially the same surgery as treating cataracts, as has been mentioned, and the only real way to properly fix presbyopia "permanently" if you opt for multifocal lenses.
"Lasik MD in Mississauga. I went for full range and the surgeon changed it to extended range based on my high myopia and shape of my cornea. She said full range wouldn't give me the desired results anyway. Quote for both was the same price"Where was that if you don't mind me asking and what's she think of it?
somehow i've maintained 20/15 and i've been sitting in front of a PC for 8hrs+/day since 1992.finally fell off the 20/15 I've enjoyed forever.
My eyes were really bad, so I decided not to do "Presby" or "Mono" vision when I did the cataract surgery.Here is what my own research and subsequent consultation with the Prism Eye Institute brought up, use at your risk and I am not a qualified optometrist or ophthalmologist!
Intra Ocular Lens or IOLs currently available in Canada are of these types:
1. Monofocal lenses are designed to provide the best possible vision at one distance, often covered by insurance.
2. Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs and these have only one corrective zone. But this zone is stretched to allow distance and intermediate vision.
3. Toric lenses have extra built-in correction for astigmatism.
4. New in the "market" are Light-adjustable lens (LAL). With an LAL, your ophthalmologist will be able to adjust the lens for any leftover refractive error after your eye heals
Items #2, #3, #4 are not covered by OHIP as they are designated as "Cosmetic" and are out-of-pocket costing $8K and up.
Some of the Clinics offer interest-free payment plans and you have to ask, mostly this is not offered upfront.
Companies that offer these lenses are: Tecnis Eyehance, RayOne, Clareon, Vivity.
The surgeon performing the procedure normally selects the best he deems for your condition, research each of the offerings and talk to the surgeon!
I have heard that some people opt for near vision correction in one eye and distance correction vision in the other and allegedly this gives the best of both worlds.
Do you have contacts?Doc says I'm too old for Lasik. But i do have cataracts that they are going to take care of. Yeeeehaaaa! Where do i buy a pair of sexy Ray-Ban's?
+1Do you have contacts?
See if you can try out bifocal lenses (if needed)
I should have done that first, and then seen if I liked it.
I think I should have gone that route with the cataract surgery.
I hate having to still wear glasses for doing anything within arm's reach.
Including eating.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Doc says I'm too old for Lasik. But i do have cataracts that they are going to take care of. Yeeeehaaaa! Where do i buy a pair of sexy Ray-Ban's?
My dad and uncle did the expensive treatment (IIRC either 5K per eye or 5K for both). No regrets. Healing time far shorter and vision instantly better than it was in decades.I believe you and my dad are of similar age.
Last time we spoke to the doctor, she said if we wanted to, he could go for the inner lens (intraocular?) replacement which would negate the need for any further correction or external eyewear once it is healed up. Roughly around $5k per eye or something like that.
Right now his cataract formation is very minimal so he still has time.