triniboy27
Well-known member
The problem with Japanese retro bikes is that people also expect retro prices.
That and people insist on comparing to modern day sport bikes.
The problem with Japanese retro bikes is that people also expect retro prices.
Heavy, expensive, unremarkable, mediocre power...it was aimed at nostalgic 50+ yr Olds with money, much like the various retro muscle cars.
Wow! You Sir are a genius. You just identified the Honda marketing formula perfectly.:lmao:
It's the same marketing strategy Ford used on the Mustang, Dodge their retro muscle cars. They are targeting the demographic who spends money on this stuff, not 18-30 year olds, they are not interested in cars or motorcycles, more interested in smart phones, and don't have any money.
This is why BMW brought back the R9T, and Yamaha the SR400. Won't work, because while baby boomers have all the money, they mostly stopped riding bikes or switched to tourers.
I really believe Honda priced their consumers out on this model like they did the VFR1200. That CB1100 at 9 or 10K would have sold well. The R9T sells below the MSRP of most bmws and has that look to it and, as a result, is sold out at every place I've queried (only two, but still!).
d
I suspect you are right about the $9-$10k price point. Although we are not comparing apples to oranges, I would much prefer the Moto Guzzi V7 line if I wanted a cool retro bike with modern bits.
The attention to detail is very high - the color scheme is very subject but I like it.
![]()
Honda should bring over their existing CB400SS and price it around $5000. But that's never going to happen.
![]()
Except BMW has no R9Ts available to buy 'till 2015 at the earliest, at their downtown toronto store. I also spoke to a buddy in England (a chap?), where they're telling him March 2015, at the earliest at his local dealership.
I really believe Honda priced their consumers out on this model like they did the VFR1200. That CB1100 at 9 or 10K would have sold well. The R9T sells below the MSRP of most bmws and has that look to it and, as a result, is sold out at every place I've queried (only two, but still!).
I really like the new CB 1100 (especially with the blue colour instead of last year's white). The price point though... Wowsa... I like retro styled bikes and it is nice to have some power and handling (and mid mount controls) to go with the naked styling. Would be nice to get an updated version of my current bike but Triumph seems to be the only company that really knows how to market retro styled bikes. Mind you, the market has spoken. I loved the Kawasaki Zephr but they never sold well at all.
![]()
Had one back in 83 not a bad bike but the clutch and gearbox were a little weak and the comstar wheels dented very easily and were on a year long back order.In my opinion this is the only good cb1100 honda ever made. They never got it right after this one. Maybe if they could come up with some decent horse power it would have been better.View attachment 51545
They couldn't get the performance out of the V65 or people on sport bikes were shocked that the standard bike kicked their ass?A lot of fun tho as honda introduced the V65 in the same year with a TV ad showing Peewee Gleason turning a sub 10.5 1/4 and calling the V65 the fastest production bike and that led to a ton of folks without a clue loosing races...
They bought into the hype that their bike was the quickest thing on wheels too bad that they weren't PeeWee.They couldn't get the performance out of the V65 or people on sport bikes were shocked that the standard bike kicked their ass?
My first bike was a CB360. I flogged a CB750 SOHC for 8 years (currently rebuilding it).Had a Honda CB 360 twin back in the early 70s (very similar to the bike pictured above) that weighed not a whole lot more than 360 pounds, put out an honest 34 hp and had a 6 speed gearbox.
No problem from North Bay to Toronto several times on a "thimble full" of gas.
I think it had more "guts" than the Honda 750 Spirit Shadow C2 I'm riding now.