Not sure what you're trying to say since it's censored out. Or if it's even directed at me. I know what no fault insurance means, and that's not what I was mistaking it for. Also, none of us has the option to not buy insurance for our vehicles.1989 Ontario changed to NO FAULT auto insurance.
...but being Ontario... we got MODIFIED NO FAULT.
If I were you I would understand what all that means before I bought anymore insurance
... or ******* about insurance
probably means the juicy addons in your package. 'extra insurnace'Not sure what you're trying to say since it's censored out. Or if it's even directed at me. I know what no fault insurance means, and that's not what I was mistaking it for. Also, none of us has the option to not buy insurance for our vehicles.
Think about this - if someone buys a second house, do they get a break on the price of the house because they already own one? Do they get discounts on hydro, taxes, gas etc because they can only physically be in one at a time? Or do people simply do the math, look at the second home in it's totality and then decide if it's something they would like to pursue?Give me a form to sign that says I will never loan out my bike, they will only ever be ridden by me.
If someone signs and then loans out a bike they are in violation of the agreement and not covered.
Charge me full rate for full coverage on my most expensive bike to insure, add a fire/theft charge for bike #2.
Problem solved.
The only reason this doesn’t happen is greed, plain and simple. Insurance companies know that if someone is in the financial position to have multiple bikes, they likely will regardless of how the insurance is charged. Same way as insurance companies will also charge someone a rate based on how much they think they can charge the client and still get away with it - and please don’t tell me this doesn’t happen because I know it happens.
Insurance in Ontario is corrupt. Anyone trying to convince me it isn’t is lying through their teeth.
You might want to put some more thought into your analogies:Think about this - if someone buys a second house, do they get a break on the price of the house because they already own one? Do they get discounts on hydro, taxes, gas etc because they can only physically be in one at a time? Or do people simply do the math, look at the second home in it's totality and then decide if it's something they would like to pursue?
The cost to your insurer is the same to rebuild either home regardless of where you were that evening.
Think about this - if someone buys a second house, do they get a break on the price of the house because they already own one? Do they get discounts on hydro, taxes, gas etc because they can only physically be in one at a time? Or do people simply do the math, look at the second home in it's totality and then decide if it's something they would like to pursue?
The cost to your insurer is the same to rebuild either home regardless of where you were that evening.
Yeah sorry, you didn’t think this example through. Get the hazmat suit on, the flames are coming.Think about this - if someone buys a second house, do they get a break on the price of the house because they already own one? Do they get discounts on hydro, taxes, gas etc because they can only physically be in one at a time? Or do people simply do the math, look at the second home in it's totality and then decide if it's something they would like to pursue?
The cost to your insurer is the same to rebuild either home regardless of where you were that evening.
lol it's good to be back. The next one will be better refined.Yeah sorry, you didn’t think this example through. Get the hazmat suit on, the flames are coming.
7 times last year, 3 bikes.How often are you switching?
Nothing the gov't runs will be cheaper, take away the profit motive and efficiency goes with it.When was Ontario auto insurance "government run"?
I have never seem a "government run" insurance system that was cheaper. The policy may be cheaper, but the shortfall is made up from general coffers, so NON users end up sponsoring YOUR insurance policy. Lower insurance rates for the driver, higher taxes for ALL.
No thanks.
I'd settle for this as a start.7. Unhitch liability and personal injury insurance from vehicles and attach it to drivers.
Nothing the gov't runs will be cheaper, take away the profit motive and efficiency goes with it.
Gov't needs to take a reformer's role in Ontario auto insurance. My wishlist of things that would make things better:
1. Transparency. Insurers should be mandated to disclose payouts and actuarial data to the public
2. Increase personal privacy. Insurers should not be able to share claims or payout information.
3. Open the market to competition. New entrants should not be hogtied by the insurance lobby or onerous regulation designed to limit access to the market.
4. FSCO should have a 'citizen board' that represents Ontario drivers. They should have seats at the director table and have some veto power over regulation and deal making between gov't and the insurance cartel.
5. IBC should not be allowed to coordinate the do's and dont's with respect to policy offerings - individual insurers should be free to innovate.
6. Cap limits on payouts to remove the financial burden of personal injury lawyers, tow operators, body shops, shady rehab centers, and fraudsters.
7. Unhitch liability and personal injury insurance from vehicles and attach it to drivers.
Uh... yes on insurance. I have blanket liability, covers all my properties and my boat.Think about this - if someone buys a second house, do they get a break on the price of the house because they already own one? Do they get discounts on hydro, taxes, gas etc because they can only physically be in one at a time? Or do people simply do the math, look at the second home in it's totality and then decide if it's something they would like to pursue?
The cost to your insurer is the same to rebuild either home regardless of where you were that evening.
How much liability is associated with having a hundred motorcycles in your garage is somebody going to trip over one and sue you or what?Uh... yes on insurance. I have blanket liability, covers all my properties and my boat.
In the US, my 1m liability covers me, my house and my car. If I had a hundred bikes in my garage, they would be covered too.
Has anyone insured their second bike with TD they just told me that I could insure my second bike for as little as a day
so let’s say I insured my second bike my Bonneville for September their cancellation policy for September is they retain 10%.
Has anyone actually done a short term insurance with TD and paid that little? Or do you end up canceling at the end of your short term and get raped by TD?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To put some numbers around this they quote me 637 annual that includes multi bike etc. etc. they tell me I have to pay 301 for the rest of this insurance year year which is September through end of January. OK so this is great. If I ensure for just September am I really only paying 64 bucks. Because that simply amazing
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk