Priller
Well-known member
My understanding is that the MotoGP teams are the only ones where the grid fees essentially pay for the team, and sponsorship is gravy money. That's why both Gresini and RNF have pulled out of the lower classes, as they are contracting and only keeping the guaranteed profits. That said, I'm still surprised that they either can't find sponsorship, or that there must be some minimum amount that the teams agree on to stop sponsorship deflation.I'll have to find the article, but the money that the satellite teams get from Dorna basically cover the costs of the bike lease. It also seems more and more popular for factories to give rider contracts to satellite riders, saving more money for the satellite team.
In the case of Gresini, since Flex-Box was a Ducati family sponsor, I have to believe that Ducati is now subsidizing them (I equate it to how KTM is sponsoring Tech3 after the latter lost Red Bull). Also, with Gresini losing the Aprilia works relationship, I am guessing that Dorna gave them a little extra. They will keep them afloat for a few years, but Gresini will eventually have to figure out how to fund their team on their own (I give them 3 years). Gresini has pulled out of Moto3 so that tells me that they are counting their money carefully.
The other area sponsorship can help is with incentive-based rider contracts. Apparently some teams in the lower classes have been pushed to the brink of bankruptcy when a rider does much better than expected. If you push that onto a sponsor (who really benefits from the added exposure anyway), it helps the team control risk.
(On another point, with that kind of control in the premier class, I'm disappointed that Dorna has allowed so many Ducatis onto the grid. I get that the other manufacturers are part of the problem, but it's not good for the competition for more than a third of the bikes to be the same model.)