Dick. It looks like he may have avoided hurting others so I guess that's a plus.
I slowed it down and it looked like he might have missed the bikes. I can't tell for sure. He definitely clipped the mirror but I am less concerned about property damage than damage to other people. Clipping the mirror may just add to his charges which I'm ok with.Thought he clipped a mirror and a cyclist, then there were those who came through at the same speed afterwards.
Yeah, looks like he got just ahead of the cyclists and then used his front brake.I slowed it down and it looked like he might have missed the bikes. I can't tell for sure. He definitely clipped the mirror but I am less concerned about property damage than damage to other people. Clipping the mirror may just add to his charges which I'm ok with.
Dick. It looks like he may have avoided hurting others so I guess that's a plus.
I can't really fault the car in this situation with the evidence that we have.I hope you mean the red car that started in the left lane and then changed into the rider's lane.
I can see your point. I do believe we need to see the 10 seconds before the clip to make a judgment.Those 360 cameras always make it look like you're going faster than you are. Look at how quickly the bikes pass the camera, yet are still able to stop right in front of the rider. Also, it seems the car has its brake lights on and look at how close to the shoulder it is. It looks like it may have been pulling over to stop behind the bicyclists.
We have the benefit of replay but only have 18 seconds. From what I am seeing, I would agree that the red car entered the riders lane. It also appears to me that the rider intentionally took out the mirror then realized he f***ked it and was in for hurt. But I am merely speculating at my keyboard so I have activated the dick switch. To me, the rider chose to as well.I hope you mean the red car that started in the left lane and then changed into the rider's lane.