Why are insurance quotes not based on at fault claim amounts?

油井緋色

油井緋色

Well-known member
Site Supporter
Topic.

I was thinking about this today. Ontario is one of the most, if not most period, expensive places to live for insurance in the world. And from what I've gathered, it's because the majority of Ontario citizens are little pussies that drain the living hell out of their insurance and claim "whiplash" at 1km/h crashes, then start fraud from there while screaming "AHHH I AM THE VICTIM".

So after being in an 50% at fault accident where it cost the insurance dudes 3k to repair my RAV4 last year, and having paid almost 13,000 worth of insurance over the past 7 years to them, they've made a nice 10k profit on me. Why the **** am I getting the same increase as somebody who is 100% at fault, takes income replacement for a few months because they're a little girl, and goes into "rehab" without any broke bones.

Why are insurance quotes not based on how much $$$$ you use? Why the **** are we stuck paying for others?

/rant over
 
2 reasons ..... 1) liability is the bigest hit you take on insurance . Thats the part that covers you for hurting someone....... 2) Ontario is the most populated place in Canada. So the chance of getting into a wreck is higher there then any wheres else ( save for B.C. where they drive at 299kph)
 
i like the idea that at-fault accidents go up the same rate regardless of whether you kill the other driver, or just scratch their bumper

imagine if you killed the other driver? and your insurance quotes were rated based on how much your insurance company had to pay out?

driving/riding on public roads will only be in your dreams
 
油井緋色;1774611 said:
Topic.

I was thinking about this today. Ontario is one of the most, if not most period, expensive places to live for insurance in the world. And from what I've gathered, it's because the majority of Ontario citizens are little pussies that drain the living hell out of their insurance and claim "whiplash" at 1km/h crashes, then start fraud from there while screaming "AHHH I AM THE VICTIM".

So after being in an 50% at fault accident where it cost the insurance dudes 3k to repair my RAV4 last year, and having paid almost 13,000 worth of insurance over the past 7 years to them, they've made a nice 10k profit on me. Why the **** am I getting the same increase as somebody who is 100% at fault, takes income replacement for a few months because they're a little girl, and goes into "rehab" without any broke bones.

Why are insurance quotes not based on how much $$$$ you use? Why the **** are we stuck paying for others?

/rant over
Click to expand...

If you are ever unfortunate enough to have a 'serious' accident resulting in medical claims, you will understand. The bills can get into the 6 & 7 figures depending on the severity.

Medical treatment is very expensive, we just don't realize it in Canada since we are covered.
 
Dresden said:
If you are ever unfortunate enough to have a 'serious' accident resulting in medical claims, you will understand. The bills can get into the 6 & 7 figures depending on the severity.

Medical treatment is very expensive, we just don't realize it in Canada since we are covered.
Click to expand...

I don't think any of you guys read my post.

That is EXACTLY why quotes should be based on claim amounts including medical coverage. I've smashed my skull (TBI, fractured skull, had to drain blood from opening the skull, Google it, it was quite serious) before from riding a mountain bike. Took me 1 week to recovery. I took no painkillers, went straight back to school, wrote my exams, and started gym 2 weeks after while my skull wasn't fully healed. I don't expect every Ontario citizen to have the same willpower as me but I do not understand why the majority of innocent people who pay for insurance have to pay for everyone else who gets into an accident, and makes HUGE medical claims.

Their rates should go up accordingly, that's all I'm saying.

EDIT: Forgot to mention, I had the option of going into rehab because my arm was messed up, hearing treatment (left ear is deaf), and some other stuff. I rejected it all: mind over body. 6 years later I'm on a motorcycle. So no, I DON'T understand why the hell people need 6-7 digits for medical claims when you can just drop some balls and keep going at your life normally.

Did I forget to mention that I was severely depressed for a good 2 months and failed my first set of midterms because of the TBI? I was suggested professional counseling (shrink); I said hell no and kept going about my own business.
 
Last edited:
油井緋色;1774611 said:
Topic.

I was thinking about this today. Ontario is one of the most, if not most period, expensive places to live for insurance in the world. And from what I've gathered, it's because the majority of Ontario citizens are little pussies that drain the living hell out of their insurance and claim "whiplash" at 1km/h crashes, then start fraud from there while screaming "AHHH I AM THE VICTIM".

So after being in an 50% at fault accident where it cost the insurance dudes 3k to repair my RAV4 last year, and having paid almost 13,000 worth of insurance over the past 7 years to them, they've made a nice 10k profit on me. Why the **** am I getting the same increase as somebody who is 100% at fault, takes income replacement for a few months because they're a little girl, and goes into "rehab" without any broke bones.

Why are insurance quotes not based on how much $$$$ you use? Why the **** are we stuck paying for others?

/rant over
Click to expand...

The point of insurance is that we take relatively small amounts of money from many people to pay out the huge claims of the few. No one thinks they will need to make a $1,000,000 claim until it happens. If you think of it a little, if the premiums varied by the amount that you claimed, then essentially this is a situation without insurance. You rate would be nearly $0 until you make a claim, at which point your premium jumps up to $50,000+ a year (i.e. you can no longer drive).
 
油井緋色;1774928 said:
I don't think any of you guys read my post.

That is EXACTLY why quotes should be based on claim amounts including medical coverage. I've smashed my skull (TBI, fractured skull, had to drain blood from opening the skull, Google it, it was quite serious) before from riding a mountain bike. Took me 1 week to recovery. I took no painkillers, went straight back to school, wrote my exams, and started gym 2 weeks after while my skull wasn't fully healed. I don't expect every Ontario citizen to have the same willpower as me but I do not understand why the majority of innocent people who pay for insurance have to pay for everyone else who gets into an accident, and makes HUGE medical claims.

Their rates should go up accordingly, that's all I'm saying.

EDIT: Forgot to mention, I had the option of going into rehab because my arm was messed up, hearing treatment (left ear is deaf), and some other stuff. I rejected it all: mind over body. 6 years later I'm on a motorcycle. So no, I DON'T understand why the hell people need 6-7 digits for medical claims when you can just drop some balls and keep going at your life normally.

Did I forget to mention that I was severely depressed for a good 2 months and failed my first set of midterms because of the TBI? I was suggested professional counseling (shrink); I said hell no and kept going about my own business.
Click to expand...

I did read your post, and perhaps you should re-think your position.

Your theory leaves no affordable way for individuals with a "high-claim" to be insured. The common denominator for an insurance company is to charge adjusted premiums across the board to afford claims, and make $. Which is why they bump people with bad driving records, or high claims.

Your story is irrelevant. And quite frankly, if I were in your situation I would have taken all the care available to me under the govt's coin.. thats what its there for!


Trying to hard to be an outlier is not going to get you anywhere.
 
Dresden said:
I did read your post, and perhaps you should re-think your position.

Your theory leaves no affordable way for individuals with a "high-claim" to be insured. The common denominator for an insurance company is to charge adjusted premiums across the board to afford claims, and make $. Which is why they bump people with bad driving records, or high claims.

Your story is irrelevant. And quite frankly, if I were in your situation I would have taken all the care available to me under the govt's coin.. thats what its there for!


Trying to hard to be an outlier is not going to get you anywhere.
Click to expand...

...I guess Canada is a country where the weak expect to be carried by the strong?

EDIT: And it's "Trying to hard to be an outlier is not going to get you anywhere." kinda of attitude that is making Canada choke on itself. Take aid when you absolutely need it (ie, I'm not gonan cut open my skull myself and drain the blood out if I'm unconscious). Do not take aid when your willpower alone can get you through it: people don't work out, run Tough Mudder, or race for fun to "get anywhere". They want to prove to themselves and the people around them that they aren't little pussies; you don't get anywhere from not being a pussy. You just get stronger.
 
Last edited:
油井緋色;1775439 said:
...I guess Canada is a country where the weak expect to be carried by the strong?
Click to expand...

You're just figuring this out? I suggest you eat your grandparents because they're sucking the system dry!!
 
VifferFun said:
The point of insurance is that we take relatively small amounts of money from many people to pay out the huge claims of the few. No one thinks they will need to make a $1,000,000 claim until it happens. If you think of it a little, if the premiums varied by the amount that you claimed, then essentially this is a situation without insurance. You rate would be nearly $0 until you make a claim, at which point your premium jumps up to $50,000+ a year (i.e. you can no longer drive).
Click to expand...

Are you sure it isn't the same people constantly making million dollar claims?

I find it kinda fishy that our insurance is so ridiculously high compared to other areas. I'm just whining; I plan to move to silicon valley when I finish my degree due to job demands (plus there are A LOT more riders there) but still gotta deal w/ this insurance crap here for 4-8 years.
 
RetroGrouch said:
Best way to pay less insurance: grow older and don't hit anyone. Worked for me like a charm.
Click to expand...

Still pay 2-10x more than many other countries.
 
油井緋色;1775451 said:
Still pay 2-10x more than many other countries.
Click to expand...

Any idea what the difference in coverage is?
 
油井緋色;1775448 said:
Are you sure it isn't the same people constantly making million dollar claims?
Click to expand...

The chance of making multiple $1M+ claim in your lifetime is slightly higher than winning multiple huge lotteries in your lifetime (i.e. very remote).
 
if I had to pay based on the damage i caused.. why would I buy insurance? I should just pay out every claim myself.
 
油井緋色;1775439 said:
...I guess Canada is a country where the weak expect to be carried by the strong?

EDIT: And it's "Trying to hard to be an outlier is not going to get you anywhere." kinda of attitude that is making Canada choke on itself. Take aid when you absolutely need it (ie, I'm not gonan cut open my skull myself and drain the blood out if I'm unconscious). Do not take aid when your willpower alone can get you through it: people don't work out, run Tough Mudder, or race for fun to "get anywhere". They want to prove to themselves and the people around them that they aren't little pussies; you don't get anywhere from not being a pussy. You just get stronger.
Click to expand...

Totally irrelevant.

fastar1 said:
Think harder!
Click to expand...
+1

If you don't like the system, use your voting power to change it (or gather enough support to run yourself).

Hipster protests (i.e. Point, click, e-rants) don't go anywhere. See Kony 2012 for proof.
 
Dresden said:
+1

If you don't like the system, use your voting power to change it (or gather enough support to run yourself).

Hipster protests (i.e. Point, click, e-rants) don't go anywhere. See Kony 2012 for proof.
Click to expand...

Not sure what you're talking about -- that has nothing to do with fastar1's post.
 
油井緋色;1775451 said:
Still pay 2-10x more than many other countries.
Click to expand...

What countries have you got quotes for? Revrandy just came back from California and his insurance is cheaper in Ontario.

As an Aside, I had an offer in Silicon Valkey last year (Palo Alto), you might want to check what rent costs there!! The average house price is $1.6 million.
 
I remember thinking similar questions many moons ago after a 0% fault claim.

The short answer is that your insurance rate has nothing to do with how much you have put in, or taken out of some mythical kitty in the past. The fact that you have made a claim, statistically speaking, says that you are more likely to make one in the future so you get packaged into a rate group with riskier/worse/whatever people.

Sure, it sucks that rates can't be based on how defensively you drive, deep knowledge of traffic patterns, fitness, ability to heal, ability to minimize personal injury with cat like reflexes, instincts to reduce property damage during a collision, and so on and so forth... They just go with what they can see on paper. Of course, they also don't know much about the other party who may be involved in a theoretical future claim, just that it will more likely be in your territory, and statistically like past claims in that territory.

Personally, I think anyone who has made a claim will learn from the experience and get better, but I'm probably just projecting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom