3 part video:
http://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/annual-survey-of-used-car-market-finds-deceitful-dealers-rebuilt-wrecks-1.1772123
It doesn't matter what field you're in, there will always be some bad apples that ruin it for the bunch. Now, I agree that dealers/curbsiders selling frame damaged wrecks should have the book thrown at them with no exceptions.
My only real beef with the video is the part where the reporter claims that you should not be charged more than $80 for the safety and e. test. This is absolute nonsense, as long as the car is advertised as "as is" and you state the cost of certification in your ad, you are in no way breaking any laws if you charge $295, $495, $695, etc.
Yes, a safety certificate costs $50 if the vehicle requires ZERO work for certification and the e. test is only $35, again, assuming there are no sensors that need to be replaced, etc. But what if the vehicle needs brakes? Tires? Bearings? Balljoints? O2 sensors? Cat converter? Am I supposed to only charge you $80? Lol...
http://www.ctvnews.ca/w5/annual-survey-of-used-car-market-finds-deceitful-dealers-rebuilt-wrecks-1.1772123
It doesn't matter what field you're in, there will always be some bad apples that ruin it for the bunch. Now, I agree that dealers/curbsiders selling frame damaged wrecks should have the book thrown at them with no exceptions.
My only real beef with the video is the part where the reporter claims that you should not be charged more than $80 for the safety and e. test. This is absolute nonsense, as long as the car is advertised as "as is" and you state the cost of certification in your ad, you are in no way breaking any laws if you charge $295, $495, $695, etc.
Yes, a safety certificate costs $50 if the vehicle requires ZERO work for certification and the e. test is only $35, again, assuming there are no sensors that need to be replaced, etc. But what if the vehicle needs brakes? Tires? Bearings? Balljoints? O2 sensors? Cat converter? Am I supposed to only charge you $80? Lol...