Study shows riding a motorcycle makes you smarter

riding in groups is like being herded around like sheep. riding on your own is far better because of squids and posers drawing attention to the group and besides you get to enjoy the ride instead of watching out for other riders clipping your bars or running into the back of you.
 
It probably helps your powers of perception. The ability to read traffic and their intentions. At the risk of sounding "flaky" you develop a 6th sense.
 
What about the riders that crash?
 
Does this include squids and posers?

Study done by a Japanese man in a Japanese country.

This clearly only applies to the Japanese. I'm 1/4th JPN, does that mean I get 1/4th of the benefit?!

EDIT: Even if this article was true, the benefits from riding a motorcycle involving spatial awareness and memory are still limited by your daily activities.

If you spend 2 hours riding a day, and the next 10 hours doing a brain dead job and drinking a bottle of vodka before you sleep, no amount of motorcycle riding is going to make you less of a retard.

I'm pretty sure this is a cumulative thing. I've spent most of my life going from chemistry, to physics, to calculus, and now to programming. I also spent a very large amount of my childhood getting my *** kicked by my parents to play the cello (and I do it damn well). It's clear that our bodies and mind work in the simple "use it or lose it" way to preserve resources (think about muscles, what happens if you don't use them).

By the same token, I never did much physical activity when I was younger, my ****** physical coordination skills are the result of the lack of usage...maybe genetics, at least that's what I hope to be true so I sleep better at night <_<
 
Last edited:
"Riding a motorcycle every day might actually keep your brain functioning at peak condition"

That limits the field substantially, and I doubt a daily pose-off at Timmies counts.
 
You're saying the brain isn't an organ?

No I am saying that just because something is an organ doesn't mean its not also a muscle. The 2 are not mutually exclusive as our crash talented undergrad who apparently now wants a 1198 (because it is 1 cm shorter than a 848 ) implied.
 
No I am saying that just because something is an organ doesn't mean its not also a muscle. The 2 are not mutually exclusive as our crash talented undergrad who apparently now wants a 1198 (because it is 1 cm shorter than a 848 ) implied.

I think he implied the brain is not a muscle..I'd say that's a good assessment. Is he wrong?
 
I think he implied the brain is not a muscle..I'd say that's a good assessment. Is he wrong?

He didn't imply that the brain is not a muscle, he said it. he implied that the reason it is not a muscle is because its an organ. That is incorrect because the heart is clearly both.
 
He didn't imply that the brain is not a muscle, he said it. he implied that the reason it is not a muscle is because its an organ. That is incorrect because the heart is clearly both.

The heart is an organ. A liver is an organ. As is lungs. Whatever reason you give, it doesn't matter as these are clasified as ORGANS.

P.S I'm not saying that you are wrong, i am just saying that its considered an organ before a muscle. But a brain is most definitly an organ...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom