Someone needs to patent a turban helmet!
And then Sikh investors before the whole thing unravels.
And then Sikh investors before the whole thing unravels.
Someone needs to patent a turban helmet!
Do you sit at home and only concentrate on coming up with these witty replies?
I've laughed at every single one.
I'm glad the Ontario Government stuck to its guns on this one. I'm curious to know the role insurance companies played in this decision. Certainly insurance companies would be happy to gauge the hell (?) out of non-helmet wearing Sikh motorcyclists, but I can't see that working if the Government said it was okay to not wear a helmet. If insurance companies could impose increased premiums for no helmet, it could set a precedent for wearing/not wearing other gear. Much like snow-tire discounts for cars. It's unfortunate insurance companies don't already do this to help encourage safe motorcycling.
Couldn't agree moreInsurance companies would probably not be allowed to discriminate against them if the gov't allowed them to not wear helmets. I can guarantee they would be taken to a Human Rights tribunal if they tried.
I'm glad the gov't stood its ground on this. Our laws shouldn't bend to them. If it's not compatible with their religion, they shouldn't take part.
While insurance companies would most likely not be able to alter premiums for religious non-helmet wearers,
Payouts in the event of injury would definitely be reduced.
My mother was injured in a car accident (not driving) and unfortunately admitted to the cop that she wasn't wearing her seatbelt. She was a passenger in the not-at-fault vehicle and her injuries were serious and required surgery.
The insurance company deducted 25% off of ALL her benefits, including income replacement, house keeping, attendant care, and the final settlement. What a seatbelt has to do with income replacement and how much you pay your attendant/house-keeper, I can't begin to understand. The point being, insurance companies CAN and WILL penalize for absence of safety equipment. I can definitely see an insurance company darastically cutting a Sikh man's treatment $$$ amounts and settlement in case of injury, even if the accident was completely not his fault.
The real question is why was this even a topic of debate and how much money was wasted dealing with it