Ok, i've just come from the UK. Had a full car licence since 1989. Had a full bike licence since 1992.
I bought a Toyota yaris, worth 7K...cheapest quote was $1700 for collision and comp. The company i went with was the only one to give me 6 years of experience discount after taking into account my UK driving history and good record. Other quotes were 6K!!
Fast forward a couple of months....I've just tried to get several quotes from companies for my bike, a 2012 FZ8 on a NEW M licence that i hope to get soon. Noboby i've spoke to will acredit me for my UK bike history unlike for the car. However the quotes are approx $900 for collision and comp.
So how does that make sense? 2007 Yaris, worth 7K, 6yrs experience is nearly twice as much as the bike quote which is based on no experience, worth 10.5K, and lets face it, is more dangerous?
Please can someone with insurance knowledge maybe explain the logic?
I bought a Toyota yaris, worth 7K...cheapest quote was $1700 for collision and comp. The company i went with was the only one to give me 6 years of experience discount after taking into account my UK driving history and good record. Other quotes were 6K!!
Fast forward a couple of months....I've just tried to get several quotes from companies for my bike, a 2012 FZ8 on a NEW M licence that i hope to get soon. Noboby i've spoke to will acredit me for my UK bike history unlike for the car. However the quotes are approx $900 for collision and comp.
So how does that make sense? 2007 Yaris, worth 7K, 6yrs experience is nearly twice as much as the bike quote which is based on no experience, worth 10.5K, and lets face it, is more dangerous?
Please can someone with insurance knowledge maybe explain the logic?