High Speed Lane-Splitting

Annnnnnnd that's why you'll never see it allowed here. Too many retards in cars and too many entitled jackasses with bikes and mad skillz yo. Thanks for the laugh at least.
 
Roomie said:
Annnnnnnd that's why you'll never see it allowed here. Too many retards in cars and too many entitled jackasses with bikes and mad skillz yo. Thanks for the laugh at least.
Click to expand...

Wow. Just wow, with the name calling. Cars were stuck in traffic, so you have to use that derogatory term?

In any case, what those two were doing is illegal pretty much anywhere.

Did he actually run his buddy over?
 
In that slow speed of traffic there's no reason the car driver couldn't look before moving. Clearly they did not so yes that warrants names. Things like that happen to people frequently on our roads and most of us have had enough of it.
 
Roomie said:
In that slow speed of traffic there's no reason the car driver couldn't look before moving. Clearly they did not so yes that warrants names. Things like that happen to people frequently on our roads and most of us have had enough of it.
Click to expand...

The car was completely in the middle lane before the bike hit it. Try to use non derogatory names then.
 
Roomie said:
In that slow speed of traffic there's no reason the car driver couldn't look before moving. Clearly they did not so yes that warrants names. Things like that happen to people frequently on our roads and most of us have had enough of it.
Click to expand...

Most of us have had enough of jerks on bikes riding like the jerks riding bikes on the video. Seeing that flip was pure gold and it couldn't have happened to a more deserving target.

Had that been here in Ontario, that riding would have fallen into "marked departure from lawful speed" jackpot prize category of HTA172. "“marked departure from the lawful rate of speed” means a rate of speed that may limit the ability of a driver of a motor vehicle to prudently adjust to changing circumstances on the highway. O. Reg. 455/07, s. 2 (2)."
 
griff2 said:
Had that been here in Ontario, that riding would have fallen into "marked departure from lawful speed" jackpot prize category of HTA172. "“marked departure from the lawful rate of speed” means a rate of speed that may limit the ability of a driver of a motor vehicle to prudently adjust to changing circumstances on the highway. O. Reg. 455/07, s. 2 (2)."
Click to expand...

Indeed! A very good example of HTA 172 applied appropriately.

Baggsy, although Roomie could have opted to not name call - he's not wrong. We have all complained tirelessly of the uneducated and often down-right horrendous driving of "cagers", and we've all moaned of the bad apple, GSXR riders that ruin it for the rest of us. Roomie just chose to replace all those words with "retards" and "jackasses" and paint a sweeping brush stroke - that although perhaps not true for that particular driver - is still true. LOL.

Regardless of whose at fault - that kind of accident will certainly happy far too often on Ontario roads to make it possible for the HTA rules to change and allow it.
 
Last edited:
You couldn't pay me enough to ride like that through traffic. Life ain't a video game.
 
Wtf he just keeps going
 
Bagman said:
Indeed! A very good example of HTA 172 applied appropriately.

Baggsy, although Roomie could have opted to not name call - he's not wrong. We have all complained tirelessly of the uneducated and often down-right horrendous driving of "cagers", and we've all moaned of the bad apple, GSXR riders that ruin it for the rest of us. Roomie just chose to replace all those words with "retards" and "jackasses" and paint a sweeping brush stroke - that although perhaps not true for that particular driver - is still true. LOL.

Regardless of whose at fault - that kind of accident will certainly happy far too often on Ontario roads to make it possible for the HTA rules to change and allow it.
Click to expand...

I take offense to that!
 
Macs said:
Wtf he just keeps going
Click to expand...

That's the douchiest part of the whole thing. I guess you have no regard for your own life or the lives of others if you ride like that.
 
I think the first rider target fixated....at least a bit. The old saying of "going where they were" applies.

From the comments: "from several sites discussing this video, the bike in the lead was stolen."....so, who knows.

Where does it say the camera bike was a friend?
 
Bagman said:
Indeed! A very good example of HTA 172 applied appropriately.

Baggsy, although Roomie could have opted to not name call - he's not wrong. We have all complained tirelessly of the uneducated and often down-right horrendous driving of "cagers", and we've all moaned of the bad apple, GSXR riders that ruin it for the rest of us. Roomie just chose to replace all those words with "retards" and "jackasses" and paint a sweeping brush stroke - that although perhaps not true for that particular driver - is still true. LOL.

Regardless of whose at fault - that kind of accident will certainly happy far too often on Ontario roads to make it possible for the HTA rules to change and allow it.
Click to expand...

https://i0.wp.com/media.tumblr.com/...5cc78c53b/tumblr_inline_ms5h45Ei4j1qz4rgp.gif
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom