Hi all,
As outlined in http://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900668:
(1) If automobile “A” is parked when it is struck by automobile “B”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 668, s. 17 (1).
When insurance companies determine fault, do they only look at the fact that automobile "A" is parked and was struck by "B"? Not taking into consideration of all other factors? That is, the car is legally parked, of course. I would like to not get into the details about "all other factors", as this case may be recognized by individuals that I know browse the forums.
I guess this question applies to all the other listings on the page, when determining fault, do they only look at strictly what is outlined in the act?
As outlined in http://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/900668:
(1) If automobile “A” is parked when it is struck by automobile “B”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 668, s. 17 (1).
When insurance companies determine fault, do they only look at the fact that automobile "A" is parked and was struck by "B"? Not taking into consideration of all other factors? That is, the car is legally parked, of course. I would like to not get into the details about "all other factors", as this case may be recognized by individuals that I know browse the forums.
I guess this question applies to all the other listings on the page, when determining fault, do they only look at strictly what is outlined in the act?