Canada-U.S. price gap to be probed

CruisnGrrl

Well-known member
Site Supporter
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2011/09/06/18648546.html


OTTAWA - Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says he shares Canadians' "irritation" with the price discrepancies between some consumer goods in the U.S. and Canada and has asked the Senate finance committee to look into the issue, according to a letter obtained by QMI Agency.
With the Canadian dollar trading at par and even sometimes above the U.S. greenback, Flaherty wrote to the committee's chair and vice-chair Tuesday to ask them to find out why the price gaps still exist.
"A stronger dollar should benefit Canadian consumers," Flaherty wrote. "Canadians work hard to support themselves and their families. When they spend their hard-earned money they deserve to pay a price that reflects the strength of our dollar.
"Canadians are rightly irritated when they see large price discrepancies on the exact same products being sold on different sides of the border," he added. "I share their irritation."
In April, the Bank of Montreal reported Canadian consumers pay about 20% more than American shoppers on a wide variety of goods. In 2009, that price gap was around 7%.
According to the BMO report, Canadians pay an average of 20% more for magazines, 28% more for Blu-ray DVDs and 48% more for certain running shoes. A Mezzaluna chopper, a kitchen knife, costs about 34% more in Canada, Gap cargo shorts are 15% more expensive and golf balls cost 11% more, the report found.
[TABLE="width: 125, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 8"]
invisible.gif
[/TD]
[TD]
tophits.cgi

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
With the Christmas shopping season "only months away," Flaherty asked the committee to study the price discrepancies during the upcoming fall parliamentary session. He would like the committee to hear from consumer groups, economists, retail organizations, small businesses, distributors, importers, retail analysts, "and -- most importantly -- everyday Canadians."
"I strongly believe Canadian consumers would welcome such a study and its findings," the letter reads.
But even if the Senate recommends action, Flaherty could be slow to respond.
He asked the Senate finance committee to study the future of the lowly penny in the spring of 2010. Last fall, the senators recommended scrapping the one-cent coin because it costs 1.5 cents to produce and has lost 95% of its purchasing power since it was introduced in 1908.
Flaherty, though, has yet to act and officials in his office continue to say he is still reviewing the report.
 
Forget golf balls and cargo shorts, what about the difference in things like gas and vehicles?
 
Flaherty and friends are in election mode again building popularity, its the "we got your back Canadians" show again. An inquiry will prove yup there seems to be a difference, and the re sellers, retailers and manufacturers will carry on with frt differentials, lease rates, wages and three dozen other reasons to explain away the difference.
The government can audit the private sector all they want, it will not likely change much.
 
Flaherty and friends are in election mode again building popularity, its the "we got your back Canadians" show again. An inquiry will prove yup there seems to be a difference, and the re sellers, retailers and manufacturers will carry on with frt differentials, lease rates, wages and three dozen other reasons to explain away the difference.
The government can audit the private sector all they want, it will not likely change much.

Which is different from ANY politician how? You'd think Ontario was flush with cash the way McGuinty is throwing it around pre-election. He's like a rapper at an after party for crying out loud.

Agree with the pointlessness of the study but for different reasons. A conservative government should not be getting involved in private sector pricing. If they really want to affect something they SHOULD be controlling, increase the amount of goods permissible to bring back from the US on day trips to say...I don't know...north of $400.

I remember a backbencher proposing this about 2 years ago with the rationale that border guards should be focusing on stopping the importation of dangerous goods (drugs, guns, etc) as opposed to be focusing on whether or not someone bought one too many pairs of shoes.

Retailers would change their tune pretty frikkin fast at that point. I wouldn't buy anything but fruit and vegetables in Canada at that point.

That all being said, last few times I have been out to GP...they have had better prices than any of the American sites...so at least our hobby is getting cheaper. :D
 
An inquiry will prove yup there seems to be a difference, and the re sellers, retailers and manufacturers will carry on with frt differentials, lease rates, wages and three dozen other reasons to explain away the difference

Come on, everyone knows the proceeds from this "price difference" goes towards paying off government debts incurred from events like the G20 summit. ;)
 
It concerns me that the finance minister doesn't understand things like tariffs and duty that make up a large portion of the price gap.:confused1:
 
Maybe they should look at the Competition bureau instead. You'd think Canada would be moving away from an oligopolistic market place if they were doing their jobs or the Act was functioning properly. Ie telecomunications and banking.
 
Problem is...retail is diversified enough that going through comp. bureau wouldn't result in much.

Loblaws is the largest food distributor in North America. In a country that's 1/10th the size of the US. Yet it would be almost impossible to pin them with a price fixing suit.
 
I am futureman.

8 months and 4.1 million tax dollars from now the report will conclude that 'Well, ****. Yep, there is still a price gap.' No further action was taken after the findings. Unrelated, taxes increased by 1.03 percent 2 months later.
 
About time they look into it. I just bought a laptop from the US because it was more than $1000 cheaper than here. Although with laptops that stupid bilingual keyboard also comes into play which a lot of suppliers will not swap out for a US keyboard because we're in Canada, eh.

When looking for SAAB parts all the quotes I get are routinely 2-3 times the prices I can find online from the US. When I ask why they're so expensive I just get the bull response of "it's SAAB man, you pay for the name" which doesn't apply when I can get it for 1/2-1/3 elsewhere. Same with my 944, used parts here cost what new or rebuilt is in the US.

If you compare to other countries it's even worse. For example, the clear plastic gauge cover on my bike is about 1/2 the Canadian dealer price here if I order from the US. It's 1/3 if I get it from Kawi in Thailand. And that's after shipping from across the world and it will get here sooner because the dealer there will have it in stock.

I barely even bother looking at local prices for anything anymore because it's almost guaranteed it's going to cost a lot more.
 
And the winning post is...

I am futureman.

8 months and 4.1 million tax dollars from now the report will conclude that 'Well, ****. Yep, there is still a price gap.' No further action was taken after the findings. Unrelated, taxes increased by 1.03 percent 2 months later.

Well done! You obviously remember the results of the Parliamentary Inquiries about price fixing by the oil companies. ;)
 
I barely even bother looking at local prices for anything anymore because it's almost guaranteed it's going to cost a lot more.

I agree. I was looking for a helmet recently. It costs $240 in US + free shipping to Niagara Falls. Here, the exact same helmet is $380 + HST! 58% more?!?! Are you kidding me? As much as I want to support local shops, I'm not going to pay almost 60% surcharge just to support canadian distributors.
 
I agree. I was looking for a helmet recently. It costs $240 in US + free shipping to Niagara Falls. Here, the exact same helmet is $380 + HST! 58% more?!?! Are you kidding me? As much as I want to support local shops, I'm not going to pay almost 60% surcharge just to support canadian distributors.

 
i forgot to add my comment that nothing will be done because the government would collect 20-50% less taxes

not to mention, the party of big business is going to conduct an investigation into the profiteering of corporations???

lol, pure lip service. anyone foolish enough to believe the harper government will actually do something concrete to correct this inequity is very naive indeed. . .
 
not to mention, the party of big business is going to conduct an investigation into the profiteering of corporations???

lol, pure lip service. anyone foolish enough to believe the harper government will actually do something concrete to correct this inequity is very naive indeed. . .

Do you honestly believe any in power gov"t would be any different? Sure the opposition would beat their chests, but once elected......
 

Back
Top Bottom