You could be right.
However, the ratio that applies to your hypothetical is this: canadian law does not currently recognize a father's wishes in terms of what happens to a fetus--whether he wants to prevent or force a woman to get an abortion. Yes, in
Daigle v. Tremblay the case dealt with preventing an abortion (and your hypothetical deals with getting an abortion). But that difference (preventing versus forcing an abortion) doesn't help the father's case.
The fact that the pregnancy was due to a crime is a moot point, b/c the father doesn't have any rights (over what happens to the fetus) to begin with.
If I am wrong, and for some reason a court grants a father the right to force a woman to get an abortion (b/c of the fact that it was due to a crime), the woman would likely appeal it based on her Charter rights (ss. 2 & 7) being infringed. And, in my opinion, a higher court wouldn't be caught dead allowing a man to infringe upon a woman's "right to choose", and, thus, the Charter violation cannot be saved by s. 1.
Ok, so I've done your homework for you. That will be $100.