Hope this isn't an April Fool's joke: http://driving.ca/auto-news/news/why-advanced-driver-training-makes-teens-worse-drivers
That testing method doesn't always work.In order to find the false premise, extrapolate: If more training made things worse then less training should make things better, and best of all would be no training at all.
That doesn't seem like a good idea, and it fails the common sense test.
What it really means is that the "advanced training" that WAS provided, was focusing on the wrong things.
What's that, a bit of knowledge leads to overconfidence in teens? Impossible!
A study I saw said, third year as well. That might be the ones that start small and then upgrade in year two.Kinda why 2nd year riders have lots of accidents. They figure they have the beginner bug beat and push it a bit more.
With young drivers especially they probably think that because they are trained in advanced driving that they can speed and do dangerous maneuvers anywhere, and they'll inevitably end up doing it where other drivers aren't expecting it or they'll do it where the road is not designed for such things.