Search results

you don't see the spike.. 1900 7 % mere 46 years 43% full 100 years to get to 7% and only 46 to get to 43% is not a substantial hike in divorce rates? politicians don't makes laws that are not demanded by the people.. no fault demand came in because their were so many divorces.. no fault...

depression came because of the end of the war.. no jobs and double the competition.. clash of personalities.. by the time the dust settled from the depression people realized they didn't wanna stay married to someone who " challenges them" but decreases stress levels.. less competition

widows get married.. it didn't go back to the status quo from the 19th century... WW! and WW@ raised divorce rates considerably which has been my point all along.. women started working and changing the core structures..... since men and women now started competing with each other as you have...

so 7% in 1900 to 43% in 1946 is a gradual increase? in 46 years from 1 in 11 couples getting divorced to 1 in 2 getting divorced a gradual change you are saying? notice highest divorce rates right after husbands come home to find out wives are competition in and out of the house.

they did have a whole lot of dead husbands right after WW2 hard to divorce a dead guy... as the shock of the war goes away.. and both adults in a family start to work the trend start again..my claim was divorce rates skyrocketed due to the industrial revolution.. and the stats i have posted...

or yo go to asia proper and spend the rest of your life asking people that question.. good luck kinda gone off topic.. reach awyala.. you will beg him to stop dumping verifiable info on you.. dude like save every info he encounters.

better yet go to brampton(brown)/ markham(asian) ask all the old people you find.. do they know any one divorced in their age group? do they know if any one in their family was divorced in their elders... you are gonna ge ta big fat no.. and a how dare you say that look right now those...

well wait for the info to go digital and you can have it then... until then you have to rely on people who are from there.. guess what i am from the east.

its called common knowledge...

heres for US http://divorce.lovetoknow.com/Historical_Divorce_Rate_Statistics granted not official stats.

no because i know its true .. divorce is considered a stigma even today... same goes for the asian cultures and the african/mideast cultures.. ironical divorce was more common in mideast than any place east of afghanistan till world war 2

before world war 2 india was a princely state.. and after it was third world untill 2000's.. govt offices only started using computers completely only recently.. if you wait a decade or 2 maybe they will convert every record to digital format... then we can have accurate results...

thats gonna be impossible todo.. official records from present day are barely online... you need to go visit start archive in india and national museums.. all records were hand written tip recently.. heck only in the last 5 years have they managed to get the only infrastructure of the govt to...

if you wanna know more in-depth info on marriage in islam reach out to our awyala. here on gram.. dude know faaaaaaar too much about it..

not in asia or mideast or most parts of africa... divorce has been under religious and cultural scrutiny even the legal format nowadays takes culture and religion into account in those regions( most cases).. they do represent most of the world soo

so you are saying divorce rates did not take a massive boost after WW2? cause thats what i am saying.. it rocked a stable boat. before WW2 in REST of the world.. single parents were mostly due to death or some uncontrollable aspect... after WW2 divorce started to play a increasingly major...

single mothers and fathers were rare... super rare in the east and the africas. even if the spouse died family pressure would ensure remarriage in most cultures. skyrocketed after WW2

post 56

but it was stable... each pillar in the family depended on the following to survive as well as to maintain order.

you can't object after you edit your post... not fair.